Premium Top 5 Recap 8/14
MoonPicks98 Goes 4–1: Another Profitable Day for Our Premium Plays
Friday’s MoonPicks98 Premium card delivered an outstanding 4–1 record, with four of our five researched plays cashing across the CFL, MLB and WNBA.
Our only loss came from the San Francisco Giants. Every other selection got the job done, including our Free Play on the Winnipeg Blue Bombers.
Friday’s Results
✅ Winnipeg Blue Bombers -6.5 (-119)
❌ San Francisco Giants Moneyline (-122)
✅ Miami–Cincinnati Under 8 (-115)
✅ Dallas–Indiana Under 187.5 (-115)
✅ Chris Sale Over 6.5 Strikeouts (+100)
Final record: 4–1
Assuming one unit risked on every selection, the card returned approximately +2.58 units, producing a 51.6% ROI across five units wagered.
Winnipeg Blue Bombers -6.5: WIN
Why We Liked It
Ottawa entered the matchup with significant defensive problems, while Winnipeg had the stronger roster, home-field advantage and Zach Collaros returning at quarterback.
The Redblacks had repeatedly struggled to prevent explosive plays and remain competitive for four quarters. We believed Winnipeg’s offense could eventually wear them down and create enough separation to cover the spread.
Brady Oliveira was also positioned for an excellent performance against a vulnerable Ottawa run defense.
The Result
Winnipeg defeated Ottawa 33–21, covering the 6.5-point spread by 5.5 points. Oliveira accumulated 154 total yards and a touchdown, helping the Blue Bombers control the game and finish the job. Official CFL recap
This play was also our Free Play of the Day, giving everyone in our Free Picks Group another winner.
San Francisco Giants Moneyline: LOSS
Why We Liked It
Our handicap centered on the starting-pitching matchup.
San Francisco starter Landen Roupp entered with underlying numbers that were considerably stronger than his surface-level ERA. Colorado starter Kyle Freeland, meanwhile, had struggled throughout the season and entered with particularly concerning road numbers.
We expected Roupp to limit hard contact and believed the Giants could take advantage of Freeland at Oracle Park.
The Result
This was the one matchup that went against our projections.
Freeland produced one of his best starts of the season, allowing only one run across eight innings. Zac Veen supplied the biggest offensive blow with a two-run home run, and Colorado defeated San Francisco 5–2. Roupp surrendered four earned runs over 5⅔ innings. Game recap
The matchup offered value before the game, but Freeland decisively outperformed both his season-long form and our expectations.
Miami Marlins–Cincinnati Reds Under 8: WIN
Why We Liked It
This selection was built around two quality starting pitchers.
Sandy Alcantara entered in excellent form after throwing 20 consecutive scoreless innings. Chase Burns carried a 2.61 ERA into the matchup and possessed the strikeout ability to shut down a Miami offense that had struggled to consistently manufacture runs.
Although Great American Ball Park is generally favorable to hitters, the pitching matchup outweighed the ballpark concern. Our expectation was that both starters would limit early scoring and give the under a strong foundation.
The Result
The game became an even stronger pitchers’ duel than anticipated.
Burns threw seven scoreless innings, allowing four hits while recording eight strikeouts. Alcantara also worked seven excellent innings and extended his scoreless streak to 25 innings before surrendering the game’s only run.
Cincinnati won 1–0, and the teams finished seven full runs below the posted total. MLB game recap
Dallas Wings–Indiana Fever Under 187.5: WIN
Why We Liked It
Indiana owned one of the WNBA’s most productive offenses, but the market had pushed the total extremely high.
Dallas entered without several important contributors, including Azzi Fudd, Jessica Shepard and Aziaha James. Those absences reduced the Wings’ offensive depth and made it more difficult to sustain scoring for four quarters.
We believed the total required a nearly perfect offensive performance from both teams. That created value on the under at 187.5.
The Result
Indiana pulled away in the fourth quarter and won 98–87. The teams combined for 185 points, allowing our under to cash by 2.5 points.
Caitlin Clark scored 29 points for Indiana, while Paige Bueckers scored 29 for Dallas. Even with both stars delivering major offensive performances, the elevated total remained just high enough. Official WNBA game summary
Chris Sale Over 6.5 Strikeouts: WIN
Why We Liked It
Sale entered the matchup with a 2.20 ERA and was averaging more than seven strikeouts per appearance.
The Diamondbacks presented a competitive lineup, but Sale still offered elite swing-and-miss ability. At a line of 6.5 and plus-money odds, we believed seven strikeouts was an attainable target with excellent value.
This prop also allowed us to back Sale’s individual performance without depending on Atlanta’s offense or bullpen to win the game.
The Result
That distinction proved important.
Atlanta lost 2–0, but Sale delivered six strong innings, allowing only one run and recording nine strikeouts. He cleared the prop by 2.5 strikeouts despite receiving no offensive support. MLB video recap
It was a perfect example of why player props can sometimes offer better value than a traditional moneyline.
A Strong Night Built on Multiple Markets
Friday’s success did not come from relying on one sport or one type of wager. The 4–1 card included:
A CFL point spread
An MLB moneyline
An MLB game total
A WNBA game total
An MLB player prop
That diversification allowed us to attack the strongest individual opportunities instead of forcing every selection into the same market.
The Giants play did not work, but disciplined flat staking and four winning selections still produced a highly profitable day.
Never Miss the Next Card
Want every MoonPicks98 play delivered directly to your phone and email?
Join our Premium Picks to unlock the complete daily card, or subscribe to our Free Picks Group and receive selected plays at no cost.
Let’s Rocket Your Bankroll to the Moon!
Results are not guaranteed. Please wager responsibly and only risk what you can afford to lose.




Comments